Alex Lees wrote:
Graham Catley wrote:
It is actually amazing what detail you can see from even very small digital images and I fancy that more seabirds could be proven with a little effort but maybe most land based seawatchers do not carry telephoto lenses whereas boat based seabird chsers invariably do. I was rather pleased I had my lens at hand when the S P P flew past otherwise I am sure it would never have been accepted or even maybe cosidered in such an odd location.
I don't think its that easy with a DSLR Graham - there's a big difference between a
Pterodroma in a fjord and one being claimed at 2 mile range 'beyond the Runnelstone', you'll not even find the thing in the viewfinder on a sunny day, never mind when its F8 and horizontal rain.... I've seen quite a few good digi-scoped images of mega seabirds in recent years - inc BB Albatross on a seawatch so don't leave that avenue out either. However for anything relatively close-in then you need the DSLR to hand...
http://home.planet.nl/~hend0845/Brunnic ... lemot.htmlIts probably much easier to video distant seabirds rather than attempt to go for the "killer" still image. Video may be lower res, but its much easier to get usuable footage, plus you stand a chance of getting the all important jizz.
Of course, if i pick up a distant pterodroma/mega seabird i'm more likely to be yelling directions than thinking of videoing it. I might yell "someone take a ****** picture" i suppose!