blgp_birder wrote:
james smith wrote:
Apologies for the strength of my comment John but i just see your original comment as part of the arrogance shown by some on here towards the inexperienced.
Don't be so sensitive James. John made a totally valid point. The birds are there to be found, like it or not!!
I reckon 85 species would have been possible if the weather was not so windy and cold, missed stuff like Redshank, Little Grebe etc, as I said.
Josh,
If it isn't too much trouble

can you list all 85 species that would have been possible... At least doing this it shows those with less experience what birds to look for.
My best total in a day is 50, without breaking my neck in the process.
Regards
Max