The Lincolnshire Bird Club

The LBC Forum. To register on this forum YOU must NOW be a member of the LBC - see Membership Page for details.
To join the LBC Forum you must be a Member of the Lincolnshire Bird Club - Click here for Membership Information
If you would like to post an item, but ARE NOT a forum member please submit information using the Record Form: if suitable the information will be posted on the LBC Forum on your behalf.

It is currently Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:01 am

LBC Homepage - The Photo Album - Submit a Record (for Non-members)/ or Request - LBC Forum Information and Access Help - Forum Information


All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:14 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 350
Location: Brigsley
http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/places ... lodge.aspx

I can't actually believe this. There was a recent survey on Moorland in Scotland where A wind farm was placed and it showed numbers of birds declined and some never managed to get back to the numbers there were before the wind turbines. I cannot believe the RSPB are supporting Wind turbines. They want to be energy efficent well whats the point in only having one? If you want to be energy efficent you would have more than one. Pointless in my opinion and may discourage important breeding species around the lodge like Nightjar and Woodlark. I thought my membership was going to have a positive effect on our birds but this is the opposite. I look forward to Dean's Comments on this subject.

_________________
http://anthonybentleywildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

UK life list 310 (Harlequin Duck)
Lincolnshire List 246 (Puffin)
Village (Brigsley) list 99 (Shelduck)

Thanks Anthony


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:08 am
Posts: 340
Location: Cleethorpes
Anthony, the RSPB's scientists conclusions are that in general Wimd Turbines have no significant effect on bird life, hence the decision to go ahead with this project. They have also shown no objection to the construction of a couple of turbines close to Bempton reserve and no doubt other reserves.

You, and no doubt Dean, will counter that other scientists have come up with the opposite conclusions worldwide but as i am sure you are aware, you can get a scientist to say what you want depending on your point of view on a particular issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 1662
Location: Lincoln
Wind Turbines have no significant effect on bird life :?:

You obviously not see these video's

http://www.moroccanbirds.com/frontpage- ... -the-video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RcTjdY1aN4

_________________
Regards
Dean Eades

Image

Take nothing but photos - Leave nothing but footprints - Waste nothing but time

My website: http://www.birdmad.com
https://www.facebook.com/dean.eades1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdmad/
http://www.lcegroup.co.uk
http://www.Canon.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:04 pm 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 350
Location: Brigsley
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17694256

This link shows a survey undertook in the highlands. This shows both sides of the story. But if they were to build at the lodge affected species would be Nightjar, Hobby, Buzzard, Cuckoo, Woodlark and Lesser Spotted Woodpecker amoung many more. I do see both sides of the story but i'm still against them. Would be interesting to know who is funding the build of this Bird slicer.

_________________
http://anthonybentleywildlifephotography.blogspot.com/

UK life list 310 (Harlequin Duck)
Lincolnshire List 246 (Puffin)
Village (Brigsley) list 99 (Shelduck)

Thanks Anthony


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:59 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 10:58 am
Posts: 1375
Location: Theddlethorpe
I continue to wonder why solar panels are not more widely used , i noticed a large farm shed with c 50 panels last week, are they less effiecient ? there certainly far less intrusive. regards John.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:20 am 
Offline
North Lincs Bird Recorder
North Lincs Bird Recorder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:48 pm
Posts: 1011
Location: Louth
Baffles me too John. At construction they're relatively cheap to install so why not on all new builds?

I was in Turkey last autumn and noticed that almost every little shack had its own solar panel and hot water tank on the roof, even very humble dwellings out in the desert

John

_________________
Lincolnshire Birds https://www.flickr.com/photos/120340949 ... 8078912016
-------------------------------
Image

Contact: recorder_north@lincsbirdclub.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:55 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 1662
Location: Lincoln
All new home should be fitted with solar panels... I also see a large farm shed somewhere with loads on =D> =D> =D>

_________________
Regards
Dean Eades

Image

Take nothing but photos - Leave nothing but footprints - Waste nothing but time

My website: http://www.birdmad.com
https://www.facebook.com/dean.eades1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdmad/
http://www.lcegroup.co.uk
http://www.Canon.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
Lincs Bird Club Member
Lincs Bird Club Member

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 10:58 am
Posts: 1375
Location: Theddlethorpe
If RSPB, National Trust and other conservation organisitions were to use and promote solar
the political backing and especially large funding monies may have some diverted into better support of solar power, and fewer wind turbines, especially those offshore which seem horrendously expensive and costly to mantain, i understand those out from Gib have 4 twin hull boats travelling from the Humber down and back each day and each boat burns around 450 litres of fuel per day
Hmmmm what carbon output in the manufacture of turbines, construction and maintainance plus all the undersea power cables and overland pylons and cabling to users, against the so called carbon savings ?? given that the life of each offshore turbine is calculated at 20 years.
When i look at the Louth industrial site and all the spare ground and large roof spaces i think of the hundreds of solar panels that could be erected and the energy being used locally. or are there other reasons such as large site rental payments and various grants, ( for wind turbines)
Perhaps i,m too cynical and see it in too simple a way ???? a good topic to debate and welcome any comments with a better insight and understanding of the issues. regards John.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites