The Lincolnshire Bird Club

The LBC Forum. To register on this forum YOU must NOW be a member of the LBC - see Membership Page for details.
To join the LBC Forum you must be a Member of the Lincolnshire Bird Club - Click here for Membership Information
If you would like to post an item, but ARE NOT a forum member please submit information using the Record Form: if suitable the information will be posted on the LBC Forum on your behalf.

It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 11:16 pm

LBC Homepage - The Photo Album - Submit a Record (for Non-members)/ or Request - LBC Forum Information and Access Help - Forum Information


All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:17 pm
Posts: 31
Location: Peterborough
:( Natural England: New wildlife agency in jeopardy after cutbacks
_____

New wildlife agency in jeopardy after cutbacks

By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor, The Independent
Published: 27 July 2006

England's high-profile new wildlife agency, charged with bringing rare and
endangered species back from the brink, is being crippled before it starts
by massive budget cuts demanded by the Government, its chairman says.

Sir Martin Doughty, the chairman of Natural England, which begins operations
in the autumn, has made an outspoken behind-the-scenes protest about the
size of the funding cutbacks.

In a private letter to the Environment Secretary, David Miliband, which has
been seen by The Independent, he warns: "The scale of these cuts risks the
wheels coming off the organisation before it even reaches October's
launchpad."

Environmentalists too are up in arms about the proposed cutbacks, fearing
that they will deal a crushing blow to the recovery prospects of many
endangered habitats and species such as the corncrake, the once-familiar
farmland bird which is all but extinct in England.

"These cuts will put back the recovery prospects for a whole range of
species for years," said Mark Avery, director of conservation for the Royal
Society for the Protection of Birds. "This is meant to be an exciting new
agency, but this is a terrible start."

The Government has made great claims for Natural England, which is to be a
beefed-up version of the present wildlife watchdog body, English Nature. But
with its proposed cutbacks it is looking at an environmental public
relations disaster similar to the row earlier this year over the scrapping
of Britain's leading wildlife research centres.

The new agency is taking over English Nature's wildlife responsibilities,
such as looking after sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs), and
implementing species recovery programmes. It is also taking over the
landscape and access work of the Countryside Agency, such as maintaining the
footpath network and implementing the right-to-roam. The result is meant to
be an all-singing, all-dancing agency which can look after the countryside
and its wildlife.

But the proposed slashing of its budget by the Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is putting a very large question mark over
its ability to do its job, according to Sir Martin.

In his letter to Mr Miliband he writes: "I am deeply concerned that current
financial demands being placed upon us by Defra are eroding our capacity to
deliver these benefits before we even begin.

"I understand the need for Defra to live within its budget and Natural
England is committed to playing its part in that - we are already committed
to £7m of cuts. This is on top of nearly £8m in cuts imposed in December
last year. However, [Defra] has now asked us for an additional £12m to be
obtained in-year from Natural England and our founding bodies.

"Given that in-year cuts would largely be programme rather than staff-based,
this equates to a 40 per cent cut to the remainder of our programme on a
pro-rata basis. This comprises a 54 per cent cut to the remaining
uncommitted programme."

Sir Martin said yesterday that the cuts, if implemented, would make it
difficult to achieve two key government environmental targets - to get 95
per cent of SSSIs in good condition by 2010 and to reverse the 40-year
decline of farmland birds such as the skylark, the grey partridge and the
turtledove by 2020. He described the proposals as "most unfortunate".

Peter Ainsworth, the shadow Environment Secretary, said last night: "This
Government keeps talking about the importance of protecting the natural
environment, but when they get a funding crisis it's ... first in the firing
line."

Matt Shardlow, director of Buglife, the Invertebrate Conservation Trust,
said: "If the Government just committed the money it takes to build 30 miles
of dual carriageway they could get wildlife in England sorted out. They
could turn around the loss of biodiversity. Instead it's cuts, cuts, cuts.
It's thoroughly depressing"

Ellie Robinson, assistant director of policy at the National Trust, said:
"These cuts mean the new agency's work will be compromised before it's even
started."

A spokeswoman for Defra said: "Defra, like most government departments, is
operating within a tight fiscal regime and has to continually look for
savings and make efficiencies.

"We intend to deliver our budget arrangements equitably across our delivery
agencies and within the department.

"We are fully committed to the creation of Natural England as a powerful
champion for the natural environment that will conserve and enhance our
landscapes and biodiversity, and help people enjoy them.

Projects under threat

Natural England, which starts work in October from its headquarters in
Sheffield, will take over the functions of English Nature, the current
wildlife watchdog body, and also the landscape, access and recreation
functions of the Countryside Agency. It will further incorporate the present
Rural Development Service which distributes hundred of millions of pounds in
grants to farmers to implement agri-environment schemes.

Environmentalists are concerned about what the funding cuts will mean to the
conservation work being carried out by English Nature. This includes:

* Managing wildlife sites: English Nature looks after 213 national nature
reserves and more than 4,000 sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs).
As the latter are often privately owned, the agency enters into management
agreements with the owners to maintain the sites in good condition. At the
moment, fewer than 80 per cent of SSSIs are in good condition. The
Government target is 95 per cent by 2010. The cuts will make attaining this
less likely.

* Species and habitat recovery programmes: Britain's wildlife has suffered
in the past four decades from the introduction of intensive farming,
pesticides, artificial fertilisers, and new cropping regimes. Farmland birds
have shown spectacular declines: lapwings, skylarks (right), tree sparrows
and grey partridges are all down by over half their numbers of 40 years ago.
Specialised habitats such as lowland heath or chalk grassland, with rare
flowers such as the marsh gentian (right) and rare butterflies such as the
adonis blue (far left) have also suffered. Many English Nature programmes
are addressing these declines, but cuts may curtail some of them.

* Reintroductions: Some species which were extinct in England, such as the
red kite, have been brought back with great success. Current reintroduction
programmes include the corncrake; future programmes may include the sea
eagle (above left). Cuts will affect these programmes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites